HomeProceduresRobotic Prostatectomy

Robotic Prostatectomy

A robot-assisted, keyhole operation that removes the prostate and seminal vesicles to treat localised or locally advanced prostate cancer.

Surgical Pelvis (prostate gland and pelvic lymph nodes) Avg. stay 7 days 1 clinic From $11,000

Overview

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for localised or locally advanced prostate cancer in which the entire prostate gland and seminal vesicles are removed and the bladder is reanastomosed to the urethra. NHS commissioning guidance and major specialist units (UCLH, The Christie, Cambridge University Hospitals) describe it as the standard surgical option for most men requiring prostatectomy, with patients now often discharged the day after surgery instead of the 4-5 days typical of open surgery. The procedure is performed through six small abdominal port incisions with the da Vinci surgical system. The surgeon, seated at a console, controls wristed instruments that translate hand movements into precise, tremor-filtered actions inside the pelvis, while a three-dimensional high-definition camera provides magnified visualisation. Nerve-sparing techniques preserve the neurovascular bundles where oncologically safe, with the aim of maintaining erectile function and continence. Indications include intermediate- and high-risk localised prostate cancer, and selected low-risk disease in younger men. Most patients are discharged within 24-48 hours with a urethral catheter that is removed at 7-14 days. International patients typically remain in-country for about one week for catheter removal and the first wound check. Functional recovery of continence and erectile function continues for up to 12 months. Sources: NHS UCLH, NHS Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Christie, NHS England commissioning policy, PMC randomised trials.

Hospital & stay

2–3 nights
Hospital stay
7 days
Total stay abroad
Surgical
Procedure type

Procedure details

How it's performed

Under general anaesthesia, six small ports are inserted into the lower abdomen and the patient is placed in steep Trendelenburg position. The da Vinci robotic arms are docked and the surgeon operates from a console, dissecting the bladder away from the prostate, dividing the dorsal venous complex, and removing the prostate, seminal vesicles and surrounding fascia. The neurovascular bundles are preserved when oncologically safe. The bladder neck is reconstructed and a vesico-urethral anastomosis is created over a urinary catheter. Pelvic lymph nodes are sampled if indicated.

Preparation
  1. 1Multidisciplinary review of biopsy histology, multiparametric MRI and (if indicated) PSMA-PET staging.
  2. 2Pre-operative bloods, ECG, group-and-save and anaesthetic assessment.
  3. 3Pelvic-floor exercises started 4-6 weeks before surgery to aid post-operative continence.
  4. 4Bowel preparation per local protocol; stop anticoagulants and antiplatelets as advised.
  5. 5Informed consent covering potential incontinence, erectile dysfunction and need for adjuvant therapy.
Recovery
  1. 1Day 0-1: Most patients are discharged within 24-48 hours of surgery.
  2. 2Days 1-7: Home with urethral catheter; light walking encouraged; no heavy lifting.
  3. 3Day 7-14: Catheter removal in clinic and first wound check.
  4. 4Weeks 2-6: Gradual return to office work; continue pelvic-floor exercises.
  5. 5Weeks 6-12: First post-operative PSA and continence assessment.
  6. 6Months 3-12: Continence usually returns by 3-6 months; erectile function recovery is monitored with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and rehabilitation as needed.

Clinics offering Robotic Prostatectomy

Related procedures

Related procedures

Clinical evidence for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

12 peer-reviewed sources

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the most common surgical approach for localized prostate cancer in many centers, and a substantial evidence base now compares it with open and laparoscopic surgery. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews generally report comparable cancer-control outcomes alongside advantages in blood loss and recovery, while continence and erectile function recovery depend on nerve-sparing technique, tumor characteristics, and surgeon volume. The references below cover comparative effectiveness, functional recovery, oncological results, and emerging refinements such as NeuroSAFE-guided and Retzius-sparing approaches. Surgeon experience is a recurring factor in outcomes, underscoring the value of high-volume, specialized centers. These studies describe population-level findings, and individual results vary with cancer stage and overall health.

  1. Comparative functional, perioperative and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy
    Suartz CV et al. · International Urology and Nephrology · 2026
  2. NeuroSAFE-guided robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard RARP: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Suartz CV et al. · Journal of Robotic Surgery · 2026
    Systematic Review / Meta-AnalysisPMID 42126466DOI
  3. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matalani CFA et al. · Clinics · 2025
    Systematic Review / Meta-AnalysisPMID 40294454DOI
  4. Comparative effectiveness of robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mirza W et al. · Journal of Robotic Surgery · 2025
    Systematic Review / Meta-AnalysisPMID 41345763DOI
  5. Lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marimpietri FS et al. · Journal of Robotic Surgery · 2025
    Systematic Review / Meta-AnalysisPMID 41243047DOI

Compiled from peer-reviewed medical literature indexed on PubMed. This overview is for general education and is not medical advice. · Last updated 2026-06-15